Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the“three-stitch” Graham patch technique

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

“Three-stitch” laparoscopic Graham patch repair (LGPR) for perforated duodenal ulcer enjoyed the same advantage as open Graham patch repair. However, it was not a popular approach because it had problems of suture entanglement and difficult laparoscopic suturing and knotting. The authors describe their technique and results.

Methods

A prospective series from January 2000 to September 2004 was examined. In this study, 35 LGPRs were performed for 32 males and 3 females with a median age of 47 years (range, 18–76 years).

Results

No conversion occurred for any of the 35 LGPRs attempted. The median perforation size was 5 mm (3–10 mm), and the median operative time was 86 min (range, 55–163 min). The median time for ambulation was day 2, and the median time for discharge was day 4. Morbidity was 11%, involving one chest infection, one retention of urine, one pelvic collection, and one pyloric stenosis. There was no reoperation, leakage, or mortality.

Conclusion

The authors’ LGPR technique was safe and efficient, and might be the choice for laparoscopic repair of relatively large perforations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnaud JP, Tuech JJ, Bergamaschi R, Pessaux P, Regenet N (2002) Laparoscopic suture closure of perforated duodenal peptic ulcer. Surg Laparosc Percutan Tech 12: 145–147

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cougard P, Barrat C, Gayral F, Cadiere GB, Meyer C, Fagniez L, Bouillot JL, Boissel P, Samama G, Champault G (2000) Laparoscopic treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers: results of a retrospective multicentris study. French Society of Lapaoroscopic Surgery. Ann Chir 125: 726–731

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuschierri A, Szabo Z (1995) Tissue approximation in endoscopic surgery, Isis Medical Ltd, UK

    Google Scholar 

  4. Darzi A, Cheshire NJ, Somers SS, Super PA, Guillou PJ, Monson JRT (1993) Laparoscopic omental patch repair of perforated duodenal ulcer with an automated stapler. Br J Surg 80: 1552

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Druart ML, Van Hee R, Etienne J, Cadiere GB, Gigot JF, Legrand M, Limbosch JM, Navez B, Tugilimana M, Van Vyve E, Vereecken, Wibin E, Yvergneaux JP (1997) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11: 1017–1020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Graham RR (1938) Technical surgical procedures for gastric and duodenal ulcer. Surg Gynecol Obstet 66: 269–287

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jennings WC (1993) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer by Graham omentopexy. J Okla State Med Assoc 86: 383–384

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Mason RJ, Campos GM, Soroushyari A, Berne TV (1999) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 134: 845–850

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Koninger J, Bottinger P, Redecke J, Butters M (2004) Laparoscopic repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer by running suture. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:11–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lau H (2004) Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 18:1013–1021

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, Davey IC, Robertson C, Dawson JJW, Chung SCS, Li AKC (1996) A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg 224: 131–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lau WY, Leung KL, Zhu XL, Lam YH, Chung SCS, Li AKC (1995) Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 82:814–816

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J, Barth X, Lombard-Platet R (1990) Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 77: 1006

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Munro WS, Bajwa F, Menzies D (1996) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers with a falciform ligament patch. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78: 390–391

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BKB, Chau CH, Li ACN, Fung KH, Tai YP, Li MKW (2002) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235:313–319

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. So JBY, Kum ML, Fernandes ML, Goh P (1996) Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 10:1060–1063

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Takeuchi H, Kawano T, Toda T, Minamisono Y, Hagasaki S, Sugimachi K (1998) Laparoscopic repair for perforation of duodenal ulcer with omental patch: report of initial six cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:153–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wemyss-Holden S, White S, Robertson G, Lloyd D (2002) Color coding of sutures in laparoscopic perforated duodenal ulcer: a new concept. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 177–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. W. F. Lam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lam, P.W.F., Lam, M.C.S., Hui, E.K.L. et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the“three-stitch” Graham patch technique. Surg Endosc 19, 1627–1630 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0020-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0020-1

Keywords

Navigation